A battle for Baptist autonomy: The McRaney case against the North American Mission Board and why it should matter to Southern Baptists
Editor’s note: With the approaching annual meeting of the Southern Baptist Convention June 11-12 in Indianapolis, Ind., The Baptist Report revisits notable events and current issues of the nation’s largest and most influential Protestant denomination.
A significant legal battle is unfolding that transcends mere courtroom proceedings and is at the heart of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC).
The case revolves around Will McRaney, former executive director of the Baptist Convention of Maryland and Delaware, and his clash with the North American Mission Board (NAMB), the domestic mission entity of the SBC. But why should Southern Baptists care? Let's delve into the details of the litigation.
The Players: Will McRaney vs. NAMB
McRaney, a respected leader within the Baptist community, found himself at odds with NAMB after his tenure as executive director of the Maryland-Delaware convention took an unexpected turn. It is a dispute that could shape the future of Southern Baptist autonomy.
Led by Kevin Ezell, NAMB is an influential arm of the SBC and plays a pivotal role in coordinating missions, church planting, and evangelism across North America. Its actions reverberate throughout Baptist congregations, making any legal confrontation significant.
The Allegations: Defamation and Funding Threats
McRaney alleges that NAMB officials defamed him and orchestrated his dismissal by threatening to withdraw essential funding from the Maryland-Delaware convention. The stakes were high: a million dollars in annual budget allocation hung in the balance. But McRaney's case goes beyond personal grievances; it strikes at the heart of Baptist polity.
The Ecclesiastical Abstention Doctrine
Courts typically avoid meddling in "ecclesial" matters – those related to church governance and doctrine. However, McRaney contends that his firing was not protected by the religious exemption granted to faith-based entities because NAMB wasn't his direct employer. When NAMB sought changes in its relationship with the Maryland-Delaware convention, McRaney resisted. He became an early casualty in a larger conflict between state conventions and the national SBC.
The Legal Landscape: Supreme Court's Decision
The United States Supreme Court dealt a blow to NAMB's hopes of ending the case prematurely in June 2021. Rejecting NAMB's request, the court allowed McRaney's lawsuit to proceed in lower courts. McRaney hailed it as a victory for all Southern Baptists who believe in the autonomy of local churches and Baptist bodies. McRaney’s Facebook post celebrated the court's recognition of this separation. A trial date was set in February and oral arguments will be heard before the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on April 4.
The Religious Exemption Question
More than three dozen outside parties weighed in, urging the Supreme Court to halt McRaney's case. They argued that allowing it to proceed would infringe on religious liberty rights. However, the court remained unmoved. This decision opens the door to a critical examination of how far the "religious exemption" extends for faith-based entities. McRaney's case challenges the boundaries of this exemption, potentially setting a precedent.
Why Southern Baptists Should Care: Autonomy is at Stake
At its core, this legal battle isn't just about McRaney or NAMB – it’s about the autonomy of Baptist churches. If NAMB's actions can influence state conventions to terminate leaders, what does it mean for local congregations? Southern Baptists must grapple with questions of authority, independence, and the delicate balance between denominational structures and local church governance.
Transparency and Accountability
McRaney's quest for truth resonates with many. As evidence emerges and sworn testimony unfolds, Southern Baptists will witness the inner workings of their institutions. Transparency matters, especially in the church and denominational context. Whether you're a pastor, a layperson, or a concerned member, this case underscores the need for accountability within Baptist organizations.
Conclusion
The Will McRaney case isn't merely a legal tussle; it's a mirror reflecting the soul of Southern Baptist life. As the proceedings continue, Southern Baptists should pay attention – not just to the courtroom drama – but to the deeper questions it raises about faith, freedom, and the delicate dance between denominational structures and local church autonomy.
—
Editor’s note: This article summarizes a complex legal case. For the full details, refer to the court records and articles below.
Supreme Court rejects NAMB's request, sending McRaney case back to trial
McRaney wins two procedural moves in case against NAMB
U.S. district judge dismisses McRaney’s case against NAMB
MCRANEY v. NORTH AMERICAN MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION INCORPORATED (2020)